On the Explanation of SameAs Statements Using Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Due to the impressive growing of the LOD graph in the last years, assuring the quality of its content is becoming a very important issue. Thus, it is crucial to design techniques for supporting experts in validating facts and links in complex data sources. Here, we focus on identity links (sameAs) and apply argumentation semantics to (i) detect inconsistencies in sameAs statements and to (ii) explain them to the experts using dialogues. We formalize the framework, explaining its purposes. Finally we provide a promising preliminary evaluation and discuss on some interesting future directions we foresee.
منابع مشابه
SameAs Networks and Beyond: Analyzing Deployment Status and Implications of owl: sameAs in Linked Data
Millions of owl:sameAs statements have been published on the Web of Data. Due to its unique role and heavy usage in Linked Data integration, owl:sameAs has become a topic of increasing interest and debate. This paper provides a quantitative analysis of owl:sameAs deployment status and uses these statistics to focus discussion around its usage in Linked Data.
متن کاملLogical Detection of Invalid SameAs Statements in RDF Data
In the last years, thanks to the standardization of Semantic Web technologies, we are experiencing an unprecedented production of data, published online as Linked Data. In this context, when a typed link is instantiated between two different resources referring to the same real world entity, the usage of owl:sameAs is generally predominant. However, recent research discussions within the Linked...
متن کاملArgumentation-based decision making for selecting communication services in ambient home environments
We propose here an Argumentation Framework (AF) for decision making in order to select services in ambient environments. A logic language is used as a concrete data structure for holding the statements like knowledge, goals, and actions. Different priorities are attached to these items. These concrete data structures consist of information providing the backbone of arguments. In this way, our A...
متن کاملOn Ontological Expressivity and Modelling Argumentation Schemes Using COGUI
Knowledge elicitation, representation and reasoning explanation by / to non computing experts has always been considered as a crafty task due to difficulty of expressing logical statements by non logicians. In this paper, we use the COGUI editor in order to elicit and represent Argumentation Schemes within an inconsistent knowledge base. COGUI is a visual, graph based knowledge representation e...
متن کاملOn the Computational Complexity of Naive-Based Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are a powerful generalization of Dung’s abstract argumentation frameworks. ADFs allow to model argumentation scenarios such that ADF semantics then provide interpretations of the scenarios. Among the considerable number of ADF semantics, the naivebased ones are built upon the fundamental concept of conflict-freeness. Intuitively, a three-valued interpretat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016